Transparency in TranSTEP

Transparency is crucial to provide legitimacy for the outcomes of the TranSTEP group. However, transparency must be balanced with need to create a protected space for open dialogue.

There should be transparency regarding:

  • The initial problem formulation and the background for initiating the process
  • Information of who were invited
  • Information on the participants in the group; including any potential conflicts of interests they may have
  • The initial list of assessments identified in the assessment review
  • Agenda and detailed minutes from the meetings, specifically focusing on points of consensus and points of disagreement
    • In the points of disagreement, the arguments for the different viewpoints should be noted although without linking them to specific individuals
  • Any input received from external interested parties
  • Any other discussion with commissioning policy makers, etc.
  • A qualitative, complete and truthful reasoning for the outcome of the process

This can be achieved by making a dedicated website for the TranSTEP project.

Filming the meetings, and publishing these on the website, will be a good (and time-saving) way to demonstrate transparency, but may feel uncomfortable for the participants. This option should be discussed at the first meeting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s